I saw Stardust last night, after an entire summer of anticipation. I love the novel, a sweet but witty fairy tale by one of my all time top ten Desert Island favorite writers. With every studio trying to ride on Harry Potter’s coattails, I was worried it might suck. But buckles are swashed, maidens are rescued, enchantments broken, unicorns ridden, wonderful fun is had. The casting is excellent, every set almost exactly as I imagined it. It’s somewhat worse for wear from it’s exposure to Hollywood, but all in all it’s nearly perfect.
Keyword being “nearly.”
The plot’s streamlined, things are added and cut, which is to be expected, but why did they have to mangle Robert DeNiro’s character? I don’t care about the name change, but I’d rather not have the airship captain at all if they’re going to turn him into a gay minstrel.
Because you know what’s almost as popular as movies about boys on magical adventures? Movies with swishy pirates. As soon as DeNiro started flapping his hands and blinking coquettishly — channelling Nathan Lane in The Birdcage — I wanted to sink into the floor. Yes, DeNiro’s character Captain Shakespeare is, like the Dread Pirate Roberts, only pretending to be a bloodthirsty marauder. In truth he drinks tea, listens to classical music and dances around in a corset, petticoats and a pink feather boa (he winks at married men too). Because cross-dressers are so weird! Everybody point and laugh! And seeing DeNiro in a dress is hilarious! And being a transvestite is the same thing as being gay! What an astoundingly original approach to comedy! xazdezdsdf;vaioehgga;ipg%^&(%$^(&%^&&!1!!(That was me pounding my head against the keyboard)
But see, his crew were never fooled by his uber-macho performance. “We always knew you were a whoopsie!” They accept him anyway, even if he is a pansy (this must be a fantasy movie). So it’s okay then!
Why? Please? It adds nothing to the plot, it’s certainly not in the book (unless I am seriously misremembering it), the only reason he’s played like that is for cheap laughs.
I mean, maybe I’m being oversensitive. It’s not like there aren’t other things to criticize (androcentric plot, passive women except when they’re portrayed as evil, vain witches). And hey, Andygrrrl, didn’t you love Johnny Depp’s queer pirate?
I did, and that’s why it will be difficult for me to explain my exasperation without sounding like I have a chip on my shoulder. But Jack Sparrow doesn’t mince and lisp in private. He’s funny, but he’s not a buffoon. He’s light on his feet and he’s dangerous. He doesn’t give a good goddamn what anybody thinks, because he’ll triple-cross you, pick your pocket, slit your throat, and steal your ship before you’re done snickering at his limp wrists and eyeliner. It’s why he’s the only worthwhile, interesting thing about those films. Johnny Depp, genius that he is, has done the nearly impossible and created a dangerous, comedic antihero who just happens to come off as flamingly queer. Not “because of” or “in spite of”.
DeNiro, whatever Roger Ebert thinks, is not a genius. I can’t say I’ve seen him do anything other than shout in a Brooklyn accent (which he retains for Stardust, inexplicably, despite the fact that everybody else in the movie is British). Watching this movie, you just know some fucking sophomoric studio exec said, “Hey, you know what’s funny? Robert DeNiro in pink! Heh heh!”
I’m trying not to let it ruin the movie for me, but Christ, can I just go to the movies for once and not be insulted? Do they have to fuck with my favorite books for their own juvenile amusement? I mean, transvestites don’t go to the movies, I guess. It’s not like there are any young genderqueer children in the audience, or even kids like me who used to secretly play dress-up as the opposite sex. Fuck you very much DeNiro, and the screenwriters, and the director, you stupid, ignorant jackasses.